10.10.26

Brush, Colorado

UNCONTROLLED SKIES: The Unattributed, Under-Reported, Unresolved Gap Over American Airspace

Register 
Sponsored by Blackgrove Global Risk

WHO SHOULD ATTEND

Investigative & Legal Experts

  • Journalists & Independent Researchers: Investigative reporters covering national security, or the ongoing legislative battles surrounding UAP disclosure.

  • Whistleblower Advocates & Legal Counsel: Practitioners focused on the Whistleblower Protection Act, institutional retaliation, and the rights of independent defense contractors.

  • Policy & Legislative Aides: Congressional staff and local government representatives seeking a better understanding of the gaps between All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) reporting and independent data collection.

State & Federal Homeland Security

  • Homeland Security Analysts & Intelligence Officers: Personnel analyzing domestic asymmetric threats, tracking low-altitude incursions, and managing the intersection of civilian tech vs. state-sponsored surveillance gaps.

  • CISA & Infrastructure Security Specialists: Professionals tasked with protecting soft targets, defense installations, and mapping vulnerabilities against unmonitored localized drone swarms.

Public Safety & Emergency Responders

  • County Sheriffs & Municipal Police Leadership: Law enforcement personnel who are the frontline contacts during public airspace panics, managing community anxieties without clear communication lines from federal agencies.

  • Critical Infrastructure Protectors: Security directors for power grids, oil and gas networks, reservoirs, and nuclear facilities who require advanced counter-UAS (C-UAS) and early-detection tracking frameworks.

Aviation & Defense Professionals

  • Commercial & Private Pilots: Captains, first officers, and air traffic controllers concerned about near-miss protocols and unidentified traffic in non-segregated domestic airspace.

  • Aerospace Engineers & Drone Operators: UAV developers and software engineers interested in how autonomous swarm telemetry and low-observable tracking tech operate outside standard military infrastructure.

  • Defense Contractors: Professionals working in radar innovation, counter-UAS (C-UAS) technologies, and signatures management looking to analyze known gaps in domestic radar networks.

Rural Community Leaders

  • Residents, local law enforcement, and county officials from regions historically impacted by unresolved low-altitude drone activity who want to see how local airspace is being monitored.

A public presentation of first-hand whistleblower data and mission materials revealing the severe Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) detection gaps within American domestic airspace and transparency initiative designed to bridge the intelligence gap between corporate contractors, federal investigative limits, and the public interest.

This presentation will dissect the systematic failure to identify, intercept, and report sophisticated low-altitude aerial anomalies. The event is organized into four distinct modules:

❋ The Colorado/Nebraska Mystery Drones Case Study

Materials Available: Details from the ArchAngel RECON operations in northeast Colorado.

Data Scope: What local radar missed regarding synchronized, low-altitude flights tracking Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs).

❋ The "TicTac" Intercept Attempt

Materials Available: Profiles and data intended to identify layered tech anomalies operating beneath traditional airspace thresholds.

❋ The Whistleblower Receipts

Materials Available: Verification of communications with the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) staff.

Data Scope: Correspondence documenting the sudden reversal of protections under the Whistleblower Protection Act.

❋ Tech & Hardware Buildout

Materials Available: Customized sensing arrays, autonomous drone swarms, and tracking setups utilized to test domestic military radar vulnerabilities.

  • "Throughout this process, I was repeatedly told that I was protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act — until suddenly I was informed that I was not..."

    -- Michael Spicer

  • "We have not received any information that enabled us to determine what exactly it was that people were reporting seeing and, if they were drones, who was flying them"

    — FAA spokesperson Ian Gregor, January 6, 2020

  • "Countering unlawful and adversarial drone activity is a homeland defense imperative. There is no 'silver bullet' to address this challenge..."

    — Army Brig. Gen. Matt Ross (Joint Interagency Task Force 401 Director)

Presenting Partners & Sponsors

Share This Event

Register for Uncontrolled Skies

Location Provided to Registered Attendees Brush, Colorado

Session 1: 10am-12pm

Session 2: 2pm-4pm

Closed-door ticketed event: 5pm-8pm (Sponsored by Blackgrove Global Risk)

 

The Briefing Room

Airspace transparency requires constant vigilance and adaptation. The following breakdown addresses the core operational, legal, and technological questions surrounding the "UNCONTROLLED SKIES" initiative. This repository serves as a direct, fact-based resource to cut through bureaucratic confusion regarding domestic Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) incursions, local law enforcement gaps, and the ongoing whistleblower landscape. Because the regulatory environment and airspace security data are rapidly evolving, we will continue to add new questions and verified insights to this section as further telemetry and official correspondence are cleared for public release.

Press Kit & Media Contact

  • Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) refers to the physical drones, automated flight software, and synchronized payload arrays used to conduct coordinated, low-altitude grid-pattern flights over domestic territory.

  • This event is strictly focused on national security and infrastructure vulnerabilities. The data presented demonstrates how easily accessible, commercial-scale UAS technology can bypass civil aviation radar to map territory and exploit domestic airspace blind spots.

  • Because regional and federal authorities routinely fail to identify, track, or legally attribute sophisticated, low-altitude UAS grid operations. This leaves a severe, unresolved gap in who operates in the airspace directly above critical American infrastructure.

  • Michael Spicer (@WhistlingMike) has stated that while he was initially assured of formal protections under the Whistleblower Protection Act by Senate staff, those protections were abruptly reversed. This event will present the physical timeline and correspondence logs documenting that breakdown.

  • While AARO leadership has pushed back against aspects of Spicer's account, this presentation will counter that narrative directly. The event will showcase verified communications, receipts, and flight files that challenge the government's public conclusions.

  • Spicer asserts that the government's invocation of the Invention Secrecy Act against his proprietary tracking arrays serves as official, backhanded validation. It proves the technology successfully exposed airspace detection gaps that multi-billion-dollar federal networks missed.

  • No. All materials displayed are completely unclassified, consisting of proprietary flight logs, independent telemetry, and legal correspondence recovered by legal counsel from secure government spaces

  • When these massive drone swarms originally occurred, local first responders were left completely in the dark, forced to handle public anxiety without any real-time tracking support or data sharing from federal agencies. This event reveals the ground-level data they were missing.

  • The telemetry logs prove how easily unmonitored UAS swarms can precisely navigate around soft targets, electrical grids, reservoirs, and power hubs using simple automated latitude and longitude matrices without triggering federal aviation alerts.